IRMA-2009 Analysis
Exam Snapshot
|
Like every year the management exam season
for 2009 begins with IRMA and this was an exam that was the right primer
for the upcoming IIFT and CAT exams and the remainder of the test season.
IRMA 2009 was on the lines of 2008 with the exact same distribution
of Qs across sections and the areas that were tested. The paper can
be classified as "Easy-Moderate" in terms of the difficulty level
and had no major surprises compared to that of 2008. Though students
might feel happy about their performance, the point to be kept in mind
is that the "Relative performance" alone matters which means that
unless one gets a better score than the others, he/she will not be able
to get the coveted call from IRMA. This year the score in the 'Issues
of Social Concern' section will determine the fate of the students.
However with this section being quite difficult with emphasis on trivia,
the scores in this section would be quite low and those who were able
to balance their performance in the other three sections would stand
a good chance of securing a call. The ideal number of attempts in this
paper would be around 120-130 and this coupled with an accuracy level
of 80-85% should help one get a call.
English Comprehension
No. of Questions: 40
IRMA gave a slightly different English
Comprehension section this year, with a lot more emphasis on Vocabulary
than on Reasoning or Grammar. To begin with there was a passage on "Organic
Farming and the Green revolution" which is in line with kind of passages
given by IRMA in the past few years. There were 10 direct Qs from this
passage and 5 Qs on Vocabulary from words highlighted in the passage.
The passage was taken from an extract written by Kiran Patil titled
"Organic Farming in India". The Qs were straight forward and the
choices were quite direct and this would have increased the number of
attempts, accuracy and score. The Vocabulary Qs from the passage were
slightly tricky and could have confused students. The 5Qs on the 'Correct
phrase to be inserted into the blank' were all based on topics of
rural development and if one read the sentence carefully there were
enough clues to reveal the answer. The 5Qs on para-Jumbles were
nowhere near the standard of CAT and each one of them could be answered
in quick time. There was a cloze test on "Rural India" which
had 10Qs. Here a score of around 7-8 was possible in about 5-6 minutes.
A good time allocation for the RC would be around 12-15 min and that
for Verbal would be around 15-20 mins. Overall this was a slightly easier
section than the one in 2008 and the cut-offs are expected to go up
from 20 marks in 2008.
The cut-off for this section is expected
to be around 20-24. A score in the range of 28-30 should be considered
to be very good.
|
Quantitative Ability
No. of Questions: 50
The Quant section of IRMA includes topics
from Arithmetic, Data Interpretation and Speed Math. Those with a penchant
for quick calculations would have been at an advantage in this section.
The questions on Arithmetic were very easy and were based on the straight
forward application of formula and did not call for any reasoning to
be exercised. The DI sets on 'Villages' and the one on 'Children
going to school' involved fairly simple calculations and should have
been attempted. The number based puzzle on 'Men, women and children
with various past-times' ad all the data embedded and was the one
to be attempted for a high score in this section. The only limiting
factor in getting a huge score in this section would be time. A good
time allocation for this section would be around 35 min.
The cut-off score should be around
22-26. A score in the range of 32-34 should be considered to be
very good.
|
Analytical Reasoning
No. of Questions: 50
Those not familiar with the Critical
Reasoning variety of Qs would have found this section to be on the tough
side (next only to the Issues of Social Concern section). The easy Qs
that would have boosted the scores of such students were the 10 Qs on
Decision Making pertaining to the 'selection of a candidate' and
the logic puzzle pertaining to the seating arrangement which could have
been cracked in less than 2 mins and should have been attempted. Similarly
the questions on 'Odd One Out' were quite straight forward and involved
simple logic and would have helped students attain the cut-off score.
The Critical Reasoning Qs comprised of 'Course of Action', 'Inferences',
'Cause & Effect' and 'Statement & Assumption'. Of these
the ones on Course of action were easy and should have been attempted.
A good time allocation for this section would be around 35-40 min and
attempts in the range of 30-35 with an accuracy of around 80% would
be considered good. Overall this was a section on par with the one in
2008 and the cut-offs are expected to be slightly higher than the 20
marks of 2008.
The cut-off score for this section should
be around 20-24. A score of around 32-34 should be considered
to be very good.
|
Issues of Social Concern
No. of Questions: 60
This section always is the key to determining whether one gets a call from IRMA or not. This year it wasn't any different! The Qs in this section can be described as being quite tough with a focus on 'schemes' of the Government and trivia relating to them. This section can be classified as the toughest amongst the 4 sections of IRMA. Students would have had the feeling that even with a lot of reading this section would have been a difficult nut to crack. The questions were very descriptive and required a lot more reading than a typical General Awareness question. This was further complicated by the very tricky and difficult answer choices given. Most questions pertained to Government schemes, definitions of terms, economics, agriculture and poverty. A good time allocation for this section would be around 15 min.
The cut-off score would stay around that
of last year at about 13-17. A score of around 20+ should be
considered to be very good.
|
IRMA Fact file
|
** The cut-off for XIMB (RM) program is expected to be around 76-80