Exam Snapshot
|
Number
of Questions
|
150
|
|
Sections
|
3
|
|
Marking
Scheme
|
1
|
|
Negative
Marking
|
0.25
|
|
Number
of Choices
|
5
|
|
Duration
|
120
Min
|
NMAT-2008 was on expected lines with three sections testing the students in
Quantitative, Reasoning and English. NMAT 2008 had 150 questions in
three sections with a time limit of 120 minutes. The five choice
format created problems for students in the RC section of the paper
and all in all this was a test that tested the speed of the students.
Let us now look at the individual sections in detail.
Section 1
No.of Qs : 40 (40 Marks)
Description : Language Skills
The Language Skills section of NMAT can be classified as Moderate and for
those who have prepared for CAT this would have been quite an easy
outing. However it should be noted that the five choice formats
makes no difference in the Quant and the Data Interpretation section
but plays a huge role in the Verbal area. The five choices in NMAT
did exactly that and with two close choices in the RC passages it
wasn’t smooth sailing at all. The antonym/synonym questions
based on the passage were easy but then one needed to look at the
passage to understand the contextual meaning and then find an
appropriate choice. The verbal questions on Cloze test, Para-forming
questions and Grammar were of the moderate difficulty level but the
questions on vocabulary were among the easier ones.
A good time allocation strategy for this section would be around 25-30
minutes. A score of 28+ should be considered excellent. The cut-off is expected to be around 18-20.
|
Area
|
Description
|
No.
of Qs
|
Difficulty
level
|
Expected
Attempts
|
Excellent
Attempts
|
|
Reading
Comprehension
(India-
A developed nation by 2010)
|
Reading
Comprehension (based on passage)
|
10
|
Moderate
|
5-6
|
8-9
|
|
Antonyms/Synonyms
|
5
|
Easy-Moderate
|
2-3
|
4
|
|
Verbal
|
Cloze
Test
|
10
|
Moderate
|
5
|
8-9
|
|
Para
Forming Questions
|
5
|
Moderate
|
2
|
3
|
|
Grammar
|
5
|
Moderate
|
2
|
3
|
|
Vocabulary
|
5
|
Easy-Moderate
|
2-3
|
4
|
|
Overall
|
|
40
|
Moderate
|
18-21
|
30-32
|
Section 2
No. of Qs : 60(60 Marks)
Description : Quantitative Skills, Data Analysis & Sufficiency
The
Quantitative Skills section of NMAT was on predictable lines with a
plethora of questions on speed math concepts (simplification). This
section had questions on Arithmetic, Data Interpretation and Data
Sufficiency and had the highest weightage amongst the three sections
in NMAT. This implies that there would have been a fair number of
questions that anyone could attempt based on their strong areas. The
Quant questions focussed on Simplifications and number series with
very few pure arithmetic topics being included. A student who is
strong in speed maths would have found this section to be a breeze
and would have ended up with a high score. However some of the
simplification, approximation based questions involved lengthy
calculations and one could have easily ended up making mistakes if
not careful. A few of the questions that appeared quite daunting
could have been solved quite easily without calculations by
approximating and simple observation. The Data Interpretation
questions focused lesser on ‘interpretation’ and more on
‘calculations’. The set on the bar graph pertaining to
students appearing for ‘CEET’ was a sitter and so were
the sets on ‘Hobby classes’ and ‘Pass and Fail
students’.
A good time allocation strategy for this section would be around 50-55
minutes. A score of 40+ should be considered excellent. The cut-off is expected to be around 24-26.
|
Area
|
Description
|
No.
of Qs
|
Difficulty
level
|
Expected
Attempts
|
Excellent
Attempts
|
|
Quant
|
Simplification
& Indices
|
15
|
Moderate
|
6-7
|
10-11
|
|
Ratio
Proportion, Percentages
|
6
|
Easy
|
4-5
|
7
|
|
Partnership,
Compound Interest, Equations
|
4
|
|
Number
Series
|
5
|
Moderate-Difficult
|
2
|
3
|
|
Approximations
|
5
|
Moderate-Difficult
|
2
|
3
|
|
Data
Interpretation & Sufficiency
|
Table
(Enrolment of students for Hobby Classes)
|
5
|
Moderate
|
2
|
3-4
|
|
Bar
Graph (Students appearing for Engineering Test)
|
5
|
Easy
|
2-3
|
4
|
|
Caselet
(Data on company)
|
5
|
Moderate-Difficult
|
2
|
3
|
|
Table
(Data on students who passed and failed in different classes)
|
5
|
Moderate
|
2
|
3
|
|
|
Data
Sufficiency
|
5
|
Easy
|
3
|
4
|
|
Overall
|
|
60
|
Easy-Moderate
|
25-28
|
40-42
|
Section 3
No.of Qs: 50 (50 Marks)
Description : Intelligence & Logical Reasoning
The Intelligence and Logical Reasoning section in NMAT-2008 was of the
Moderate difficulty level. This section was more in line with various
‘Bank PO’ exams that are conducted from time to time and
those who have prepared for such exams would have had a distinct
advantage. There were quite a few puzzles which would not have posed
a challenge to most students as they were very easy. The questions on
deductions and decision making would have been slightly trickier on
account of the novelty factor and the fact that they were not in line
with the regular questions. The questions on Coding-Decoding,
alpha-numeric series and the number based rearrangements were quite
easy and should have been attempted.
A good time allocation strategy for this section would be around 35-40
minutes. A score of 32+ should be considered excellent. The cut-off is expected to be around 20-22.
|
Area
|
Description
|
No.
of Qs
|
Difficulty
level
|
Expected
Attempts
|
Excellent
Attempts
|
|
Analytical
Reasoning
|
Alpha-numeric
& Symbol based Sequence
|
5
|
Easy
|
2-3
|
4
|
|
Deductions
|
5
|
Moderate-Difficult
|
1-2
|
3
|
|
Symbols
& Notations
|
5
|
Difficult
|
1-2
|
3
|
|
Puzzle
(Seating Arrangement)
|
5
|
Easy
|
3
|
4
|
|
Data
Sufficiency
|
5
|
Easy
|
3
|
4
|
|
Blood
Relations
|
2
|
Moderate
|
2
|
3
|
|
Number
based Rearrangements
|
3
|
Easy
|
|
Puzzle
(Distribution)
|
5
|
Easy
|
3
|
4
|
|
Coding-Decoding
|
5
|
Easy
|
3
|
4
|
|
Decision
Making
|
5
|
Moderate-Difficult
|
1-2
|
3
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
5
|
Easy
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall
|
|
50
|
Moderate
|
21-25
|
35
|
Sectional Scores and Overall Cut-Off
NMAT being the test for only one institute i.e. NMIMS, would have
sectional filters and an overall filter to help eliminate the
thousands and thereby have a smaller pool for the interview and Group
Discussion phase. However if NMIMS decides to ‘interview’
a larger pool of students than last year, the cut-offs are bound to
fall lower than what is given in the table below.
|
Section
|
Good
Score
|
Estimated
Cut-Off
|
|
Language
Skills
|
28+
|
18-20
|
|
Quantitative
Skills, Data Analysis & Sufficiency
|
40+
|
24-26
|
|
Intelligence
& Logical Reasoning
|
32+
|
20-22
|
|
Overall
|
110+
|
88-92
|
|