Venus
likely had oceans in its early years, most experts agree, for a few hundred
million to a couple of billion years, back when the sun was 30 percent less
hot. In other words, even the water enthusiasts should agree that Venus was
once a good candidate for life. “If you want to think about the best place, 4
billion years ago, to start life |in| this solar system, it would probably be
Venus,”
Don’t look for evidence of ancient Venusian life on the ground,
though, because 700 million years ago a cataclysm occurred: Fissures opened all
across the planet’s crust, and lava covered everything: a “global resurfacing
event,” in the language of another researcher. Schulze Makuch’s,
Palaeontologists looking for fossils on Venus after that catastrophe would be
like a forensics team hunting for skid marks on road that’s been long paved
over. To this day, lava flows regularly scorch the planet’s surface.
In the 19th century, astronomers saw Venus as a
bright orb, and imagined it to be a warm swamp world, much like a younger
Earth. But by the early 20th century, improved instruments and new
knowledge of the long Venusian night caused scientists to doubt life could
thrive there, despite superficial similarities to Earth in mass, gravity and
size.
Probes were launched, beginning with Mariner 2 in 1962, and
sent back information that didn’t, all the time, give hope to anyone looking
for signs of life. Mariner’s flyby glimpse was enough to reveal Venus’ stifling
carbon dioxide atmosphere. Regular volleys of flybys, orbiters, probes and
landers followed, notably 1978’s Pioneer mission and 16 different Soviet Venera
missions, many of which were predictably destroyed by either the planet’s
crushing pressure or infernal temperatures, or some combination of the two.
Each mission made the planet appear more foreboding than the last: The Pioneer
mission confirmed a dense layer of corrosive sulphuric acid clouds 50
kilometers up, while Magellan in 1994 uncovered lava flows frying the planet’s
surface. Yet buried within the glum reports are anomalies in the data that,
some now claim, may be the first hidden glimpses of life on and above the
planet.
1. Which of the following is true?
(1) Planet Venus is an exact replica of Planet Earth.
(2) There is only a vague physical resemblance between Venus and Earth.
(3) No
two physical features of Venus and Earth are same.
(4) Venus
is another Earth in all aspects.
2. Regarding the planet Venus.
(A) its atmosphere is saturated with carbon dioxide.
(B) it might have supported life in the past.
(C)
the
atmospheric pressure and temperature seem
to be too high for anything to survive.
(D) there is evidence of lava flows regularly.
(1) Only
A and B are true.
(2) A,
B and D only are true.
(3) B,
C and D only are true.
(4) all the above four statements hold good.
3. Tag the correct partners:
(1) Mariner
2 (A) the
surface of Venus
(2) Magellan (B) the
clouds above Venus
(3) Pioneer (C) the atmosphere of Venus.
(1) 1
– B (2) 1
– C (3) 1
– C (4) 1
– A
2 – A 2
– B 2 – A 2 – B
3 – C 3
– A 3 – B 3 – C
4. Paleobiologists may have to look for evidence of life on Venus,
(1) on its surface.
(2) buried underneath its surface.
(3) through probes, arbiters etc.
(4) only after establishing the fact that water once existed on
its surface.