Key for JMET
2008
Exam
Snapshot
|
No.
of Questions
|
150
Qs
|
|
Marking
Scheme
|
1
m per Q
|
|
Negative
marking
|
0.25
m per mistake
|
|
Number
of Sections
|
4
Sections
|
|
Number
of Choices
|
4
choices per Q
|
|
Duration
|
120
min
|
JMET retains its charm as the most predictable of the major exams and JMET2008
was no different. However, in no way was this among the easy exams of this
season. In fact, JMET2008 was a monster in the league of the IIFT and CAT
papers, with no respite for the students. The most common reaction among the
student community after the exam was that the “QA cutoff would very low –
tending towards 0 (!)”.
No.
of Questions: 40
The Verbal Communication section had questions from
Reading Comprehension, Grammar, Vocabulary, Analogies and Fill in the blanks.
The section had a good mix of both easy and difficult questions and a student
who picked up the right questions will have no problems in clearing the. The RC
passages were short and readable (as opposed to CAT) but like CAT, had two very
close options in most cases, which made them a nightmare to negotiate. The
vocabulary questions were not commonly used words which made them very
difficult to answer. The Fill in the blanks and the questions based on
semantics were doable and would have given opportunities to score.
Section Summary
|
Area
|
Description
|
Marks
|
Difficulty
Level
|
Expected
Score
|
Good
Score
|
|
|
VA
|
Spelling
|
Incorrect
spellings
|
1
|
Moderate
|
3-4
|
6
|
|
|
Grammar
|
Grammar/Punctuation
|
9
|
|
|
Analogies
|
Simple
|
4
|
Difficult
|
1
|
1-2
|
|
|
Vocabulary
|
Antonyms
& Synonyms
|
6
|
Difficult
|
1-2
|
3
|
|
|
FIB
|
2
Words in blank
|
2
|
Moderate
|
1-2
|
3
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
-
|
3
|
|
|
RC
|
Passages
|
5
passages
|
15
|
Moderate
|
4
|
6
|
|
|
Overall
|
|
40
|
Difficult
|
10-13
|
19-20
|
|
|
The expected score for this section should be around
10-13 in about 30-35 min. Any score above 20 should be considered
excellent.
Section
2: Logical Reasoning
No.
of Questions: 40
This section was dominated by the Logical Reasoning kind of questions, i.e.,
questions on Arguments, Strengthen & Weaken Statements and Logical Flaws.
Unlike the previous years, very few questions were based on puzzles. This
section was ambiguous and confusing and in several cases, one was better off
working out the answers by the process of eliminating choices. There were two
sets on Analytical Reasoning – one on blocks and the one based on tasks taken
up by four persons, both of which were doable. Overall, this section can be
classified as Easy-Moderate and was a section where marks could have been
scored in this paper.
Section Summary
|
Area
|
Description
|
Marks
|
Difficulty
Level
|
Expected
Score
|
Good
Score
|
|
Reasoning
|
Logical
Reasoning
|
Conclusion
of Facts
|
7
|
Moderate
|
4-5
|
6
|
|
|
Gymnasium
set
|
2
|
|
|
Set
on Father-Son
|
2
|
|
|
Analytical
Reasoning
|
Set
on Blocks
|
6
|
Easy
|
5-6
|
7
|
|
|
Set
on Tasks
|
4
|
|
|
Individual
Qs
|
5
|
|
|
Verbal
Reasoning
|
Coherent
Paragraph
|
6
|
Moderate
|
2
|
3
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
Assorted
areas
|
8
|
Moderate
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Overall
|
|
40
|
Moderate
|
14-16
|
20
|
|
|
The expected score for this section should be around 12-13 in about 25-30 min. Any score above 20 should be
considered excellent.
Section
3: Quantitative Aptitude
No.
of Questions: 40
This section of the JMET has always managed to retain its reputation of being
one of the toughest QA sections of all the management entrance exams.
Traditionally there used to be a mix of questions on arithmetic as well as
higher mathematics (from 10+2 level and sometimes graduation level
mathematics). However, this year, the paper setters completely left out the
ordinary arithmetic type of questions, involving the familiar topics of
geometry, numbers and quadratic equations etc. Further, the questions on higher
maths
used to be mostly individual questions based on standard concepts. This year,
there was a shift of focus from such type of questions to entirely application
oriented questions. With the exception of a few individual questions that
appeared in isolation, almost all the questions appeared in twelve sets of what
can best be termed as “business caselets”, with a heavy emphasis on not only
the conceptual understanding across various topics but also on the practical
application of those concepts in a real-time problem/decision making situation.
To this extent, most of the questions involved dealing with situations which
were not perfectly structured as one would find in the usual objective type
questions. An uncanny sense of discomfort would have plagued anyone and
everyone trying to make sense of this section The concepts involved were as
varied as probability distributions, present value of investments/cash flows,
linear programming, matrices, differential calculus, curve fitting etc. In
fact, the cut-off in this section is expected to be as low as 3 marks.
Section Summary
|
Area
|
Description
|
Marks
|
Difficulty
Level
|
Expected
Score
|
Good
Score
|
|
|
QA
|
Linear
Programming
|
Manufacturing
of Pens
|
2
|
Difficult
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
P&C
and Probability
|
Campus
Placements
|
3
|
Difficult
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
SI/CI
|
Project
Investment
|
2
|
Difficult
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
Differential
Equations
|
Sales
Of Mobile Phones
|
1
|
Difficult
|
0
|
1
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
Book
Value of Machine
|
1
|
Difficult
|
0
|
1
|
|
|
Matrices
|
Distribution
Channels
|
2
|
Moderate
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
Differential
Calculus
|
Revenue
Modeling
|
2
|
Difficult
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
Probability
and Expected Values
|
Returns
on Securities
|
1
|
Very
Difficult
|
0
|
1
|
|
|
Functions
& Curve Fitting
|
Forecasting
Arrivals
|
2
|
Very
Difficult
|
0
|
1
|
|
|
QA
Based DI
|
BPR
HR Flows
|
2
|
Difficult
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
RPV
& PPL
|
Efficiency
and Wages
|
1
|
Difficult
|
0
|
1
|
|
|
Co-Geometry
and
Time
& Distance
|
Warehouse
& Supermarkets
|
3
|
Moderate
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
Mensuration,
Linear Programming
and
Probability
|
Biscuit
Manufacturing
Company
|
7
|
Difficult
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
Special
Equations
|
Aircraft
Purchases
|
4
|
Difficult
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
Quadratic
Eqns. & Expressions
|
Hospital
services
|
3
|
Difficult
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
Functions
|
Ascending
Order Of Functions
|
1
|
Very
Difficult
|
0
|
1
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
Exchange
Rates
|
3
|
Difficult
|
0-1
|
1-2
|
|
|
Overall
|
|
40
|
Very
Difficult
|
5-6
|
12-14
|
|
|
The expected score for this section should be around 4-5 in about 25-30 min. Any score above 10 should be
considered excellent.
Section
4: Data Interpretation
No.
of Questions: 30
This section, though having only 30 Qs was a nightmare for most students. This
was very unlike the easy DI section of the past. Being different from what one
was used to, the sets demanded intensive calculations which made this section
moderately difficult. The easy sets here were the ones pertaining to Production
& Sales and the one on newspapers, which could have been solved with a
little bit of effort.
Section Summary
|
Area
|
Description
|
Marks
|
Difficulty
Level
|
Expected
Score
|
Good
Score
|
|
|
DI
|
Table
|
Production
& Sales
|
6
|
Easy
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Table
+ Line + Bar graph
|
Department
Store
|
6
|
Moderate
|
1-2
|
3
|
|
|
Table
|
Edible
Oil
|
6
|
Moderate
|
1-2
|
3
|
|
|
Venn
Diagram
|
Newspapers
|
6
|
Easy
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
Scatter
Graph
|
Business
Strength
|
6
|
Difficult
|
1
|
2
|
|
|
Overall
|
|
30
|
Moderate
|
7-8
|
14
|
|
|
A good time allocation for this section would have been around 24-28 min with a score of
7-8 being par for the course. Any score in excess of 14 should be considered
excellent.
Expected
Sectional Cut-off marks for at least one call
|
Section
|
From among IIT-Bombay, IIT-Delhi and IISc.
|
From
among IIT-Kanpur,
IIT-Kharagpur,
IIT-Chennai and IIT-Roorkee
|
Verbal
Communication
|
12
|
8
|
Logical
Reasoning
|
11
|
7
|
Data
Interpretation
|
7
|
4
|
Quantitative
Ability
|
3
|
2
|
Expected
Overall Cut-off marks
|
Institute
|
Expected
Overall Cut-off
|
|
IIT-Bombay
|
50+
|
|
IIT-Delhi
|
45+
|
|
IISC
|
45+
|
|
IIT-Kanpur
|
40+
|
|
IIT-Kharagpur
|
40+
|
|
IIT-Chennai
|
40+
|
|
IIT-Roorkee
|
36+
|