Maharashtra MBA CET 2012 – Paper Pattern and
Analysis
The CET 2012 paper which was held on 11th March,
2012 bore more than a fleeting resemblance to the CET 2010 paper. Our students
who went to write the test expecting a repeat of last year’s horror show were
pleasantly surprised to find that CET did not have any such pitfalls this year.
This can be attributed to the type of questions which were asked regularly in
the AIMCETs conducted by T.I.M.E. and also in the preparatory material and
handouts. Any candidate who had prepared diligently in addition to attending
our workshops would have found the going very easy. It’s almost as if CET knew
that it was breathing its last, and so decided to resist the students’ attempts
in a peaceful manner instead of behaving aggressively.
CET 2012 Paper Pattern
Total Number of Questions:
200
Total Time allotted:
150 minutes
No. of Choices per question:
5 choices
Negative Marks:
No negative marking
Number of Sections: No sections – jumbled paper
|
Q Nos
|
Area
|
Type of Question
|
Level of Difficulty
|
|
1 to 5
|
Verbal Ability
|
Reading Comprehension
|
Moderate
|
|
6 to 11
|
Analytical Reasoning
|
Deductions
|
Easy
|
|
12 to 16
|
Analytical Reasoning
|
Number Series
|
Moderate
|
|
17 to 21
|
Verbal Ability
|
Phrase Replacement
|
Moderate
|
|
22 to 26
|
Data Sufficiency
|
Logic based DS with two statements
|
Moderate
|
|
27 to 33
|
Analytical Reasoning
|
Mathematical Statements and Conclusions
|
Moderate
|
|
34 to 38
|
Data Interpretation
|
Line graph : % of profit for A and B from 2005
to 2011
|
Moderate
|
|
39 to 40
|
Verbal Reasoning
|
Inference and Parallel Example
|
Moderate
|
|
41 to 45
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
Series : Five Figure series - Find the missing
figure
|
Moderate
|
|
46 to 50
|
Verbal Ability
|
Error Spotting : Inappropriate usage or
incorrect spelling
|
Easy
|
|
51 to 55
|
Verbal Ability
|
Para jumble
|
Moderate
|
|
56 to 62
|
Analytical Puzzles
|
Eight people sitting around a square table
|
Moderate
|
|
63 to 68
|
Quantitative Ability
|
Quantitative Comparison
|
Easy
|
|
69
|
Quantitative Ability
|
Geometry
|
Easy
|
|
70
|
Quantitative Ability
|
Permutation and Combination
|
Easy
|
|
71 to 73
|
Verbal Reasoning
|
Strengthen the argument + Reason for a
statement + Conclusion
|
Moderate
|
|
74
|
Verbal Reasoning
|
Logical Interpretation
|
Moderate
|
|
75
|
Verbal Reasoning
|
Inference
|
Moderate
|
|
76 to 80
|
Verbal Ability
|
Cloze passage
|
Easy
|
|
81 to 82
|
Data Sufficiency
|
Quant based DS with two statements
|
Moderate
|
|
83
|
Quantitative Ability
|
Time and Distance
|
Easy
|
|
84 to 86
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
Series : Five Figure series - Find the missing
figure
|
Moderate
|
|
87 to 89
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
Series : Five Figure series - Find the next figure
|
Moderate
|
|
90 to 95
|
Quantitative Ability
|
Probability, Equation, SI/CI, Equation, LCM
concept
|
Moderate
|
|
96 to 100
|
Verbal Ability
|
Cloze passage
|
Easy
|
|
101 to 102
|
Analytical Reasoning
|
Direction Sense
|
Easy
|
|
103 to 109
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
Analogy : 4 Figures
|
Moderate
|
|
110 to 111
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
Series : Five Figure series - find the next figure
|
Difficult
|
|
112 to 114
|
Quantitative ability
|
Time and work, Equations, Time and Distance
|
Easy
|
|
115 to 119
|
Data Interpretation
|
Pie Chart : % of employees across various
departments
Table : % of men in each department
|
Moderate
|
|
120 to 124
|
Verbal Ability
|
Combine 2 sentences to form a coherent
starting point
|
Moderate
|
|
125 to 129
|
Verbal Ability
|
Synonyms & Antonyms
|
Easy
|
|
130 to 136
|
Analytical Puzzles
|
Circular Arrangement : not everyone facing the
center
|
Difficult
|
|
137 to 141
|
Data Interpretation
|
Table : No of Outlets, Average Sales per outlet,
Total Profit
|
Moderate
|
|
142 to 146
|
Analytical Reasoning
|
Venn Diagram : No. of projects handled -
Sanjana, Rahul,Trupti
|
Easy
|
|
147 to 151
|
Verbal Ability
|
Reading Comprehension
|
Moderate
|
|
152 to 158
|
Analytical Puzzles
|
Six events scheduled from Mon to Sun, one day
off
|
Easy
|
|
159 to 160
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
Series : Five Figure series - Find the missing
figure
|
Moderate
|
|
161 to 164
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
Analogy : 4 Figures
|
Moderate
|
|
165 to 169
|
Quantitative Ability
|
Probability
|
Moderate
|
|
170 to 174
|
Verbal Ability
|
Para completion by inserting sentences
|
Moderate
|
|
175 to 182
|
Analytical Puzzles
|
Eight people : Four Facing north and Four
facing South
|
Difficult
|
|
183
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
Analogy : Four Figures
|
Easy
|
|
184 to 186
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
Series : Five Figure series - find the next figure
|
Difficult
|
|
187 to 193
|
Analytical Reasoning
|
Input Output
|
Easy
|
|
194 to 196
|
Analytical Puzzles
|
Seven people living on seven floors
|
Easy
|
|
197 to 198
|
Verbal Ability
|
Odd Man out
|
Easy
|
|
199 to 200
|
Analytical Puzzles
|
Formation of words from the given letters
|
Easy
|
Area-wise
Analysis :
|
AREA
|
No. Of Questions
|
|
Analytical Puzzles
|
34
|
|
Analytical Reasoning
|
32
|
|
Data Interpretation
|
15
|
|
Data Sufficiency
|
7
|
|
Non Verbal Reasoning
|
30
|
|
Quantitative Ability : Pure Math
|
17
|
|
Quantitative Comparison
|
6
|
|
Reading Comprehension
|
10
|
|
Verbal Ability
|
42
|
|
Verbal Reasoning
|
7
|
|
TOTAL
|
200
|
Analytical Puzzles :
This area had significant weightage in the paper. The students
were familiar with these types of sets, sincethese
types were already covered in T.I.M.E. material, mock papers and handouts. The
question on circular arrangement in which people were facing inside or outside
was best left alone. A good score in this area would be 27.
Analytical Reasoning
:
The questions based on direction sense, deductions, input
output and
venn
diagram were easy to attempt. In deductions, the new type of question
introduced was a testing one and it was about checking the possibility of a
certain statement in addition to the usual checking of the conclusion. The
number series questions were relatively difficult. A good score in this area
would be 28.
Data Interpretation :
This section held absolutely no surprises or fear for the
students because all the sets were easy to attempt. There were a few traps
which were set so as to misguide the student, but not anything that was
difficult. A good score in this section would be 13.
Data Sufficiency :
The data sufficiency questions were of moderate difficulty
level. The logic based questions were a wee bit taxing. A good score in this
area would be 6 marks.
Non verbal Reasoning
:
The one constant factor in CET was true to its past avatars.
There were 30 questions in this area with 9 questions on analogies which were
all very doable and 21 questions on series, out of which 10 questions should
have been attempted. A good score in this section would be 17.
Quantitative Ability:
It would have taken considerable brilliance on the part of any
student to answer a question incorrectly. The 17 questions which were in this
section should not have posed any threat to even the most underprepared
student. A good score in this section is 17.
Quantitative Comparison
:
There were 6 questions in this area, all of
which were quite easy. A good score in this area would be 5.
Reading Comprehension
:
When
we analyze reading comprehension, it’s almost as if the prayers of most
students were answered ! The number of questions went down from 32 last year to
10 this year. That’s a drop of nearly 70 %. There were 2 passages with 5
questions each. The questions were direct, indirect and inference based. The
first passage was based on the foreword written for the book ‘The Beautiful Tree’.
It was easy to read and more importantly, easy to attempt answering as well.
The second passage, based on the crisis faced by Europe because of low labour productivity, was on the same lines when it came to
the difficulty level. All in all, R.C. should have been a breeze for anyone who
prepared for it in earnest !
Verbal Ability :
This
section had 42 questions. There were 2 Cloze passages, of 5 questions each,
which were very easy to answer. The vocabulary of most candidates would have
been barely tested by the 5 synonym / antonym questions and the 2 odd man out
questions. The jumbled paragraph, on the other hand, was a tricky creature. If
one understood the flow of ideas, getting 5 on 5 would be a piece of cake. But,
and that’s a very valid but, if one did not get the flow correct, it would have
surely spelt doom in this question type. An everything or nothing situation !
The 5 paragraph completion questions should have been tackled according to
one’s level of proficiency. There were 15 grammar based questions. And it was
no surprise that all were usage based. This was a section one could actually
bank on to score good marks.
Verbal Reasoning :
The
bad news is that there were verbal reasoning based questions. The good news,
nay – make that great news, is that there were only 7 questions. That should
have come as a huge relief to the students who were on tenterhooks anticipating
a dismal showing in this area. But, having said that, the 7 questions were not
impossible to attempt; especially for someone who was well grounded in the
basics of reasoning.
Overall,
the paper can be classified as a moderately easy one, albeit a bit lengthy.
After today’s CET 2012 paper, the one question on everybody’s mind is
“What will the cut-offs be ?” The average number of attempts has gone up as
compared to last year and this will be reflected in the cut-offs for sure. Also,
the students need to keep in mind that, because of the no negative marking
factor, almost all the aspirants have attempted 200 questions.
Expected Cut offs for Top 10
colleges (Out
of 240: Written Exam + GDPI score)
|
College Name
|
Open
|
OBC
|
SC
|
All India
|
|
Jamnalal
Bajaj
|
175
|
155
|
144
|
173
|
|
Sydenham (MMS)
|
168
|
150
|
140
|
166
|
|
Sydenham (PGDM)
|
164
|
148
|
137
|
162
|
|
K. J. Somaiya
|
162
|
NA
|
NA
|
161
|
|
Welingkar
|
160
|
145
|
132
|
159
|
|
S.I.E.S.
|
150
|
NA
|
NA
|
147
|
|
N. L. Dalmia
|
145
|
NA
|
NA
|
142
|
|
PUMBA
|
144
|
141
|
131
|
141
|
|
MET
|
141
|
132
|
126
|
139
|
All the best of luck to each and every one of you !!!