|
T.I.M.E. students who have been writing the All Maharastra MOCK CETs this year were thrilled after CET 2008 which was held on 17th FEB 2008. The paper pattern, the difficulty level and the types of questions had an uncanny resemblance to the MOCK papers. A couple of areas that were expected however did not appear in this year’s CET, such as Input/Output flowcharts, Decision making and Paragraph forming (parajumbles). Students who prepared extensively through the MOCKS and Material of T.I.M.E. would have been comfortable attempting the paper. Students who came out of the exam hall were left with a feeling that though the paper was actually easy, thanks to the length of the paper the number of attempts that they finally made may be just less than required to reach the score to get into the best institutes under CET. Students who have attended workshops of T.I.M.E. and went through the mocks felt that quite a lot of questions especially the area in Data Interpretation and Quant were almost exact replicas of the T.I.M.E. papers. A quick preliminary analysis would put the required marks to get into the prestigious JBIMS at the written stage at around 143 +/- 2 for Mumbai Home University Students and around 153 +/- 2 marks for the Outside Maharastra Students (OMS). CET 2008 Paper Pattern Total Number of Questions : 200Total Time allotted : 150 minutes No. of Choices per question : 5 choices Negative Marks : Not Present Number of Sections : No sections – jumbled paper
In Short the same can be categorized as
Of all Management entrance papers, Maharastra MBA CET is probably the only paper which gives less emphasis on Quantitative ability and maximum importance to Reasoning. Also, the Non Verbal Reasoning part occurs in very few exams and it is significant in CET. The same was true of the CET 2008 paper. It stuck closely to last year’s pattern, as far as Quant was concerned. Critical Reasoning (Verbal Reasoning) was much easier. The number of questions was reduced, and the difficulty came down to levels which made the candidates rather happy. Visual Reasoning had only two patterns: series and analogies. In series questions, the missing figure variation was of moderate difficult level, and the next figure type questions were easy. The analogy questions here were moderate. DI had two easy and two moderate sets. Of the verbal questions, the RC was more difficult than last year, but the other questions were simple. In short, the paper was similar to both last year’s CET and to several of our mock CET’s. The marks required for admission to top institutes are expected to be a little higher this year. One of the key problems in CET is that the marking on the OMR sheets has to be done with a PEN. That makes it very difficult for any changes to be made. There were a number of students who made mistakes in marking the answers. The marks required in the CET written examination alone, for a seat in the best institutes, are likely to be the following: Expected requirement for JBIMS (Home University Mumbai) – 143 +/- 2 marks Expected requirement for JBIMS (OMS category) – 153 +/- 2 marks Expected requirement for Sydenham (Home University Mumbai) – 140 +/- 2 marks Expected requirement for Sydenham (OMS Category) – 152 +/- 2 marks Expected requirement for KJ Somaiyya(Home University Mumbai) – 137 +/- 2 marks Expected requirement for KJ Somaiyya ( OMS category) – 150 +/- 2 marks Expected requirement for Welingkar
(Home University Mumbai) – 137 +/- 2 marks Expected requirement
for Welingkar ( OMS category) – 150 +/- 2 marks
|
